http://maggies_lens.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] maggies-lens.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] maggies_lens 2013-04-03 10:22 am (UTC)

mmmm, see I don't like the idea at all. Just...yeah no. I've read into it and the fact they can't even begin to prove it's humane is a huge red flashing sign to me. And yeah no again, I'm pretty sure a decent dentist will be able to find issues without knocking out every single horse. If the horse is a turd, then yes, but if the horse is fine then why do it? Destiny stands fine, she always has, I'd never consent to have her sedated just because the dentist wanted to. Sedation isn't good for health at the best of times, so no, no sedation without good reason. Esp not for an oldie like Danny who didn't react well to sedation the last time I HAD to use it on him.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting